|
|
Post by daviddinkinsjr on Aug 18, 2009 18:00:58 GMT -6
If it is just breaking then why does it matter that it happened Aug 5th!
|
|
|
|
Post by rollercoasterfreek on Aug 18, 2009 18:03:27 GMT -6
A reporter shouldn't post old news like this.. It's the same for leaking that list of all those positive steroid names back in 2003. I find those reportings to be an invasion of privacy and no one's business. I do agree that each name should be revealed now just to protect the innocent, but it's really lame whoever released A-Fraud's thing.
Reporters really suck today or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by rollercoasterfreek on Aug 18, 2009 18:07:57 GMT -6
I'm actually not worried about this Cable drama. If he's canned, then fine. I'm more worried about Chaz Schilens since he got injured today.
|
|
|
|
Post by daviddinkinsjr on Aug 18, 2009 18:22:13 GMT -6
Old news? how is it old news if no one in the public knew it? It's not like a reporter reporting something that was released two weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by rollercoasterfreek on Aug 18, 2009 18:46:23 GMT -6
News like this should have been released a day or two after the incident happened. Not 12 days.
|
|
|
|
Post by daviddinkinsjr on Aug 18, 2009 19:49:34 GMT -6
It wasn't known Roller.
|
|
|
|
Post by jayhawks147 on Aug 18, 2009 20:02:37 GMT -6
It may have happened two weeks ago, but that doesn't mean they found out immediately. It probably wasn't revealed publicly until yesterday. Dink is right, it wasn't know immediately after it took place, which is why it was reported late.
|
|
