Kige Ramsey
Super Admin
Sir Kigebert Ramsfield: Lord of Lexington
That's nothing... you want snow, move to Canada! -Whale
Posts: 548
|
Post by Kige Ramsey on Sept 30, 2009 11:57:52 GMT -6
1. Kansas2. Kentucky3. Michigan State 4. North Carolina 5. West Virginia 6. Texas 7. Purdue 8. Duke 9. Villanova10. Mississippi State 11. Georgetown 12.Tennessee 13. Washington 14. Butler 15.Connecticut 16. California 17. Clemson 18. Wake Forest 19. Ohio State 20. Maryland 21. Illinois 22. Notre Dame 23. Dayton 24. Michigan 25. Florida State 26. Cincinnati 27. Siena 28. UCLA29. Tulsa 30. Xavier 31. Minnesota 32. Kansas State 33. Louisville34. Syracuse 35. Vanderbilt 36. Texas A&M 37. Northern Iowa 38. South Carolina 39. Pitt 40. Georgia Tech 41. Gonzaga 42. Oklahoma State 43. Oklahoma 44. Memphis 45. Northwestern 46. VCU 47. Western Kentucky48. San Diego State 49. Utah State 50. Akron www.sportingnews.com/college-basketball/article/2009-09-30/sns-college-basketball-top-50-has-people-talking
|
|
|
|
Post by whitewhale5384 on Sept 30, 2009 12:12:52 GMT -6
West Virginia ahead of us eh? They'll be good, but not sure that good.
|
|
Kige Ramsey
Super Admin
Sir Kigebert Ramsfield: Lord of Lexington
That's nothing... you want snow, move to Canada! -Whale
Posts: 548
|
Post by Kige Ramsey on Sept 30, 2009 12:36:19 GMT -6
West Virginia ahead of us eh? They'll be good, but not sure that good. Yeah I would have put Nova at 4 |
|
melisas63
Moderator
KRS Advisory pannel member
Posts: 566
|
Post by melisas63 on Sept 30, 2009 13:43:32 GMT -6
Hell I would have put WKU at 4 lol
|
|
|
|
Post by whitewhale5384 on Sept 30, 2009 13:44:22 GMT -6
Georgetown #11 after their season is a bit surprising too, but I guess they still have a couple players from their two years of being a #2 seed in the tourney.
I also don't think Kentucky can be #2 already. They'll probably have a lot of success in a watered down SEC, but I could see them losing in the 2nd Round/Sweet 16 based on their age.
|
|
|
|
Post by jayhawks147 on Sept 30, 2009 19:00:51 GMT -6
Nova should be ranked higher, they're stacked. UNC is getting way too much credit. Do I think they'll be good? Yes, but they're very young, I think they'll have some early trouble. Same thing might happen to the Cats!
|
|
|
|
Post by rollercoasterfreek on Sept 30, 2009 19:40:16 GMT -6
We need to start unranked. Funny you didn't put my UCLA bruins in bold like everyone elses teams. Hopefully Cal and Washington represent the conference because on paper I don't see much from anyone else... maybe Oregon State will sneak in there soon.
|
|
Kige Ramsey
Super Admin
Sir Kigebert Ramsfield: Lord of Lexington
That's nothing... you want snow, move to Canada! -Whale
Posts: 548
|
Post by Kige Ramsey on Sept 30, 2009 21:30:54 GMT -6
We need to start unranked. Funny you didn't put my UCLA bruins in bold like everyone elses teams. Hopefully Cal and Washington represent the conference because on paper I don't see much from anyone else... maybe Oregon State will sneak in there soon. Fixed it  |
|
Pitino4Pres
Super Admin
2008 Kige Ramsey Show viewer of the year
KRS Advisory pannel member
Posts: 148
|
Post by Pitino4Pres on Oct 1, 2009 17:14:32 GMT -6
33? That would put us in that 8/9 game with hopefully UK as the 1 seed! Kige, I smell a second round upset!
|
|
|
|
Post by daviddinkinsjr on Oct 2, 2009 22:10:32 GMT -6
Where are my Johnnies? haha... need the top 200!
|
|
|
|
Post by whitewhale5384 on Oct 2, 2009 23:18:06 GMT -6
They still play basketball in Queens?
|
|
Pitino4Pres
Super Admin
2008 Kige Ramsey Show viewer of the year
KRS Advisory pannel member
Posts: 148
|
Post by Pitino4Pres on Oct 3, 2009 14:43:41 GMT -6
I think Seton Hall could surprise people in the Big East. Alot of returning players and Jeremy Hazell is a STUD! But the conference should be won by Nova. WVU is good too. UConn, Cuse, Marquette will be really young as will we. Pitt lost a lot of players too. I don't see 8 bids from the Big East this year.
|
|
